Pythagoras stands apart from the other pre-Socratic philosophers for having focused primarily on mathematics rather than observable phenomena to be explained in terms of other observable phenomena such as air, earth, fire, and water. In the view of Pythagoras, number is the first principle of the universe, which is ordered in a mathematical sense. The word cosmos, which means order, was first applied to the world by Pythagoras, although some of the other pre-Socratic philosophers are now referred to as cosmologists and regarded as the earliest scientists in human history.
The colony founded by Pythagoras is sometimes characterized as having been a religious cult of sorts, yet his prodigious contributions to the history of mathematics are beyond dispute and have to a large extent saved his legacy. Every child learns the Pythagorean theorem in grade school:
a2
+ b2
= c2
The
sum of the square of each of the two sides of a right triangle is equal to
the square of its hypotenuse.
Pythagoras
was essentially the founder of the discipline of mathematics. In his
view, embraced still today by modern thinkers, numbers reflect
structures in the universe, beginning with 0, 1, 2, and 3,
corresponding to the zero-dimensional point, the one-dimensional line,
the two-dimensional plane, and the three-dimensional volume of space.
Later mathematicians have worked in many more dimensions, but
everything started back in ancient times with this man in awe of the
mathematical beauty inherent in the universe.
Unlike
Parmenides, whose contribution, that “All is one,” may escape
attention by the vast majority of humanity past, present, and future,
Pythagoras provided us with the foundations of all modern applied
science and physics.
Many
people dislike mathematics, or at least they claim to dislike
mathematics. In truth, they appear not to understand mathematics. It
was never presented to them in the proper way and from the proper
perspective. They were forced by martinet schoolmarms to memorize the
principles of mathematics rather than being taught how to deduce
them.
As
a result, mathematics remains for such people an arcane,
inaccessible, and even painful subject. Because physics is the most
directly mathematical of the sciences, requiring the use of many
abstract formulas and mathematical concepts, it, too, has left many
people with bad memories. Organic chemistry is another case where the
logic of the theory must be understood in order to achieve an
understanding of the profound beauty which it embodies.
It is unfortunate that many teachers of these subjects either do not themselves grasp the essential logic involved or else they are for some reason unable to communicate it to their students. The truth is that mathematics exhibits a profound beauty in its aesthetic simplicity and symmetry, as do the more theoretical of the sciences.
To
see the patterns of mathematics in these disciplines requires that
one ascend above the formulas to the spheres from which they derive,
and this was naturally Pythagoras' strong suit. Among the theories
devised by human beings, mathematics offers the one source of and
glimpse into eternity, because nothing that happens on the planet
which we happen by chance to inhabit will ever change the truths of
mathematics.
Psychologists
have discovered correlations between mathematical and musical
ability, and not without reason: all of music is grounded in the
proportions of mathematics. In this way the beauty of mathematics is
inherent to that of music. Most people never study music seriously
and have no idea why the compositions of J.S. Bach are perfect or
what is meant when someone makes this claim, which may strike them as
the ravings of a zealot. People who have never studied and played an
instrument may enjoy music in a superficial way, but they will never
be able fully to grasp the highest pleasure of musical art, to
participate directly in its production, which can be likened to
traveling to another sphere of reality.
Is
there a parallel mathematical universe, where musicians and
physicists interact? In a sense, yes. They are privy to secrets to
which most people have no access. Plato, who arrived on the scene in
ancient Greece a bit later than Pythagoras, attempted to capture the
distinction between mundane appearance and eternal truth with his
theory of the Forms and the Allegory of the Cave, to which, he
claimed, most people are effectively chained. We remain mired in delusion and
tricked by images cast on the wall by politicians and other
shucksters who wield flickering candles to persuade us to believe in their opportunistic lies.
Plato's Allegory of the Cave has never been more relevant than today,
as images and packaging have come to take precedence over content in
the internet age.
Plato
was influenced by all of the pre-Socratic philosophers in one way or
another, but his metaphysics reflects a belief in truth and and
beauty clearly captured by the Pythagorean world view. The realm of
knowledge is separate from the realm of opinion or mere belief, which
is a fluctuating sea of ideas deriving from the contingent ephemera
of the perceived world. Beyond the realm of the senses lies the realm
of truth. This is the insight of Pythagoras which explains the
magical effect of music and also the more mathematical sciences, at
least to their practitioners.
It
is probably worth observing here that in the worldview of Plato and
some of his pals, art and beauty are not at all the same thing,
despite the common tendency on the part of modern people to conflate
them. Plato disliked poets because he thought of them as deceivers or
even liars. Beauty and Truth are absolute and immutable Forms in which both instrumental music and perfume would seem to be able to participate because they cannot “lie”. Why? Because they are non-representational and therefore have no propositional content.
All of this poses problems for people who erroneously conflate beauty and art. The two are conceptually distinct. A naturally existing canyon is beautiful. When Christo “wraps” it, he thereby creates a work of art—one which many local residents may regard as ugly. We shall return to the important distinctions between art and beauty, art and design, and truth and artifice, in future episodes of the History of Philosophy Refracted through Perfume.
All of this poses problems for people who erroneously conflate beauty and art. The two are conceptually distinct. A naturally existing canyon is beautiful. When Christo “wraps” it, he thereby creates a work of art—one which many local residents may regard as ugly. We shall return to the important distinctions between art and beauty, art and design, and truth and artifice, in future episodes of the History of Philosophy Refracted through Perfume.
The
Pythagorean-Perfume Connection
As
we have seen in the other theories of pre-Socratic philosophers,
perfume has been omitted or deleted from the version of the story to
survive. It might seem that since the world of mathematics is
divorced form the senses and the world of perfume is intimately
connected to sense perception, that the two do not intersect.
By
that argument, however, it should follow that because we apprehend
music through our ears, therefore, it can have nothing to do with the
eternal realm of mathematical truth. These misunderstandings arise
when we make the same mistake as the schoolteacher who forces his
students to memorize mathematical formulas rather than teaching them
how to deduce them from first principles.
Most
people wear perfume in the way in which they listen to music
and balance their checkbook. They use perfume functionally, just as
they use music for entertainment and numbers for the math needed to
accomplish this or that task. Music is there in the world and they
hear it, and perfume is there in the world, so they use it, But their
limited appreciation of perfume's beauty is similar to the person who
enjoys the chirping of birds or the sound of rain in the springtime.
It's there, and they notice it, and it gives them pleasure, but
that's where their understanding ends.
There
is more to perfume than just the superficial scent, just as there is
more to music than the sound waves by which we apprehend it.
Pythagoras, as a master of mathematics, no doubt appreciated perfume
as well, having recognized that the mathematical proportions so
crucial to music are equally important to perfume.
Any
professional perfumer will aver that the distinction between a
masterpiece and a disaster may lie only in the proportions used. The
ingredients of a perfume are obviously very important, but even more
important, once the basic shape and demeanor of the perfume have been
determined, are the precise proportions of the various components
used. We laypersons might consider a comparison in the case of
cooking: a dash of salt may perfect a batch of carrot
ginger soup. A spoonful may ruin it by rendering it inedible.
Lists
of notes are only the most basic way of approaching perfume. The
experience of perfume is subjective and intimate, and the joy of
perfume is found at the first level in the judicious proportions of
ingredients combined by a skilled perfumer. But the perceiver
contributes to the creation as well, just as the beauty of a poem
emerges only upon its conscious appreciation by an interpreter.
Poetry, too, pace Plato, exhibits mathematical proportions of cadence and rhythm,
in addition to the use of colorful metaphors to produce something far
more valuable than the sum of the letters used to write it.
Pythagoras
no doubt recognized that perfume, like music and poetry, offers a
transcendent glimpse into the only certainty in the universe:
mathematics. The heavens may fall, but the truth will persist. The
truth is unassailable. Behind all of the deceptive techniques used to
market fragrances in the modern world, there is a reality. Not all
that glitters is gold, and hidden treasures are out there, ready to
be found by those who do not allow themselves to be distracted by all
of the hype and folderol and focus instead upon the quality of the
perfumes which they seek out and test.
We
may disagree about which precise perfumes achieve a transcendent
level of beauty, but that is because we perceive them from our own
peculiar and idiosyncratic starting points, which are determined not
only by our biological constitution, but also all of our past
experiences and memories. Just as people exhibit various degrees of
awareness about other aspects of reality, we should expect them to
disagree, too, when it comes to perfume. We are all on a journey, and
while our perceptions may sometimes coincide, often they do not.
The
music of the spheres is ringing in the background, beckoning us to
seek out the truth by whatever means available to us. We are
fortunate to be among the select few to have access to perfume,
through which we are able to travel to an olfactory universe unknown
to the vast majority of humanity but nonetheless real.
Bravo, sherapop! You somehow made me somewhat interested in math. :P
ReplyDeleteHello, Hayven, and thanks for your comment!
DeleteI'm happy that you are ready to give math another chance, even if only "somehow" and "somewhat" ! ;-)
I don't think one can measure talent or beauty with mathematics. There were numerous examples of the purfect from the composition or technique point but completely soulless poetry or painting peaces. Yes, a wrong proportion can kill an otherwise great composition.But there is no formula to the right proportion. At least for natural ingredients: those differ not only from region to region but also from one year to another.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you need some knowledge to apreciate something that you don't like naturally; but if something moves you - be that music, sound of an ocean or a perfume - do you really need to know anything else?
Dear Undina,
DeleteIt's so nice to read you here! Perhaps in honor of you and Rusty I should post a fresh image of HRH Emperor Oliver...
Yes, you are right: proportion is necessary but not sufficient. Recipes alone don't seem to work. Not only because natural ingredients vary from year to year, but also because one needs inspiration. How many soulless perfumes have been composed using top-notch ingredients carefully combined? I'd venture to say: many!
Above I was suggesting only that those who miss the beauty in mathematics fail to see the crystalline symmetries and that the people who love mathematics do appreciate them. I did not mean to suggest that right proportion is the *only* reason why a perfume is beautiful, just that without it, it will not be beautiful and may even be a mess. It's really a very abstract concept, though, and cannot be quantified in any simplistic way.
As you say: "there is no formula to the right proportion." In the case of perfume, the situation is inordinately complex because of different people's variable sensitivities to all of the various components. That's just one of the reasons why "one perfumista's treasure is another one's trash"... Another reason is of course fundamental difference in taste.
I also agree with you about the fact that we may intuitively sense that something is wonderful without learning more about the theory. I play the piano and really never connected music theory with my own performance experience. To me, they are completely different things. I do believe, however, that we may intuit the symmetries and proportions, even if we are unable to articulate them—or simply prefer not to.
I find that playing the piano is a completely different experience from examining the score. Perhaps I could compare the distinction to writing versus editing. They involve very different skills and are quite different modes of experience, even though both involve text. In writing, one produces text. In editing, one attempts to refine it. These are distinct modes of consciousness, in my experience, although it is true that while writing may one see fit to edit and suddenly switch out of writing mode. The disanalogy is that in performing music one cannot suddenly "switch gears" without disrupting the performance! Of course, in a practice room one can do that...
Your final question, "do you really need to know anything else?" seems like a version of "I know what I like", and I definitely believe that such a maxim applies in the case of perfume. It does not matter who else in the universe exalts or scorns a perfume beloved to us. If we love it, then we love it. That's all that matters!
Thank you so much for raising these questions, Undina!
*waves HELLO : *
ReplyDelete<--- knows zilch about math but love to see this post as I do love symmetry ;)
Just wanted to let you know I read here... not always respond....
but still greatly appreciated your word wizardry <3
Guusje
Thank you, Guusje! Very nice to see you here! I know how busy you are these days... ;-)
Deletethis was shit
ReplyDeleteI'll take that as a compliment. 😂
Delete